Nudge Theory
July 19, 2011 by healthpsychologyconsultancy
I was on Three Counties radio today with Ronnie Barbour of ‘The One Show’ (TOOSH). The topic was related to a BBC article that came out today – ‘Nudge not enough to change lifestyle.’ Here are some of the points I discussed:
What is Nudge Theory?
-
Nudge Theory originated in the US through the work of Professor Richard Thaler.
-
It was introduced to Britain in 2008 when David Cameron expressed an interest in the theory.
-
This led to the development of Number 10′s Behavioural Insight Team – ‘The Nudge Unit.’
-
Nudge Theory is about encouraging, or nudging, people to make healthier lifestyle choices without being ‘nannied’ and without losing freedom of choice.
-
Rather than trying to overtly ‘change’ people’s behaviour, the idea is to subtly direct people down a particular path by altering their environment.
-
At the core of the nudges concept is making healthier options more feasible, accessible, and appealing.
Why do we need Nudge Theory?
-
Humans have deeply ingrained unhealthy lifestyle habits that are not easy to change.
-
We have 2 ways of thinking – an automatic system and a reflective system.
-
Automatic thinking – effortless and uncontrolled – tends to govern our unhealthy choices.
-
Reflective thinking – requires effort, control, and awareness.
-
To overcome habit-induced barriers to change, ‘reflective’ thinking is needed (e.g. a conscious effort to do something different, such as eat an extra piece of fruit a day).
How can nudges be used?
-
iNcentives (i.e. as opposed to punishment or penalties, e.g. healthy food vouchers). We are loss averse – losing something makes you twice as miserable as gaining something that makes you happy. Thus, rewards work better.
-
Understand mappings (e.g. help people map their options in order to make decisions that benefit them).
-
Defaults (e.g. design health interventions that people opt out of rather than opt in to).
-
Give feedback (e.g. inform people when they are doing well or how they might do better - again, this is based on rewards).
-
Expect error (e.g. offer relapse prevention strategies).
-
Structure complex choices (e.g. facilitate weighing up the pros and cons of different options).
Examples of a nudge theory as applied to health?
-
Fruit at eye level and chocolate at a lower level – increases cognitive effort – the “cost” of choosing chocolate is increased.
-
Altering the ‘default setting’ – people get salad with their meal unless they specifically ask not to have salad with their meal.
-
Opting out rather than in to organ donation.
Are nudges effective?
-
Simply asking the question, ‘do you want to quit smoking?’ has been found to encourage behaviour change.
-
Nudges are about long-term benefits – we won’t necessarily see them now.
-
Stages of change – a nudge can push us along those stages of considering or acting on change.

Fun examples of nudge theory in action:
-
Amsterdam airport – a motif made to look like a fly was embossed in the mend’s urinals - an 80% reduction in ‘spills’ and overall greater cleanliness in the toilets.
-
Sweden – refer to nudge theory as “fun theory” – bottle bank fruit machine – game where people were invited to try and insert different colour glass into the correct hole – lights and sounds when they got it right.
-
Car Manufacturer – have installed piano stairs alongside escalators in underground travel systems to encourage people to walk and exercise more. People love it!
-
Capture on camera the people who keep to the speed limit – entered into a lottery – the winning money would come from the people who were caught speeding.
Any questions? Please don’t hesitate to ask.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
Posted in Health, Psychology | Tagged Behaviour, Health, Psychology | 2 Comments
Leave a Reply
[...] Theory (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008) by now, and I have written about it a number of times – Nudge Theory and Nudge Yourself to Health. However, how the government can utilise the theory to improve the [...]
Thanks for a very nice bullet-outline of your main points on nudging, most of which I agree with:)
However, I do not fully agree with your equation of the Nudge approach to behavioral change and Fun Theory – FunTheory is overlapping, but not quite the same for reasons discussed here:
http://www.inudgeyou.com/nudge-fun-theory-and-the-role-of-incentives-in-libertarian-paternalism/
and here
http://www.inudgeyou.com/the-piano-stairs-of-fun-theory-short-run-fun-and-not-a-nudge/
Finally, it is important to notice that Thaler and Sunstein do not argue for opt-out system for registering for organdonation but for “prompted choice”. In fact, I tend to see opt-out as an ethically problematic solution, cf:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2011.634950